You may recall that Donald Trump was the winner of the 2016 presidential election but what about the others who ran against him. Did they ultimately lose?
I asked Perplexity to give me a synopsis of where each candidate is today. My purpose is to get a quick glance to determine if losing the primary was detrimental or ultimately a good thing. Please note that this entire article was written by me other than the answer given below in the quoted area. I offer my opinion on the answer given to me.
Here was my questions: In a brief synopsis (1-3 sentences), what is each person doing as of today (professionally or otherwise)?
Certainly! Here is the exact original synopsis you requested, without the links and including the bullet points as first written:
- Donald Trump: Serving as the President of the United States, enacting new policies and seeking reforms, such as changes to immigration programs and tariff strategies.
- Ted Cruz: U.S. Senator from Texas; Chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, leading bipartisan legislation and oversight, frequently positioning himself for future leadership.
- Marco Rubio: U.S. Secretary of State, active in foreign policy negotiations and major international initiatives, especially relating to Latin America, the Middle East, and Ukraine.
- John Kasich: Runs a consulting business (Kasich Company), serves as a political analyst for NBC, CNBC, and MSNBC, authors books, and gives public talks.
- Ben Carson: Chairman of the American Cornerstone Institute, board member for major corporations, active public speaker, and advocate for conservative policy reforms.
- Jeb Bush: Chairman of the Foundation for Excellence in Education, President of Jeb Bush and Associates (consulting firm), senior advisor to financial institutions, and active in school choice advocacy.
- Chris Christie: After teaching at Yale in 2024, remains a prominent political commentator and appears at public events and academic conferences.
- Carly Fiorina: Business consultant, public speaker, chair of Carly Fiorina Enterprises and the Unlocking Potential Foundation, with significant involvement in leadership development and historical commemorations.
- Rand Paul: U.S. Senator from Kentucky, advancing libertarian legislative priorities in the Senate, like auditing the Federal Reserve, and addressing border security funding.
- Mike Huckabee: U.S. Ambassador to Israel, involved in diplomacy during turbulent times in the Middle East, previously hosted the TV show “Huckabee.”
- Rick Santorum: Conservative advocate, senior advisor to the Convention of States Project, political analyst for Newsmax, and board member for several organizations.
- Lindsey Graham: U.S. Senator from South Carolina, active in foreign policy debates (notably Russia/Ukraine), facing a primary challenge but remains a key Republican figure in the Senate.
Consider the four gentlemen who lasted the longest during this contest. Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and John Kasich. John is still to this day very anti-Trump so it’s hard for me to claim he’s in a better place considering how well Republicans are doing at this moment (plus I am not anti-Trump).
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio became much stronger in their convictions and have far greater experience today than in 2016.
Part of that experience is the witnessing of how the establishment, the media, the deep state, or whatever terminology one uses to describe those who will do anything and everything to stay in power; how they desperately tried to destroy Trump. In some ways, they really did a number on his first term and, despite this, he still accomplished much.
Ted and Marco now have a battle plan, a play book if you will, on exactly what lengths the Democrats will go to win and retain power. They now understand how to stand strong and when not to bend as the Republicans of the past always did.
Even today there are Republicans who want to get rid of Trump or at least take over the MAGA movement and claim it for their own. They want to change it, adjust it, manipulate those who believe in it. They want to wiggle in and take it for themselves.
Ted and Marco understand what MAGA is and what it was and what it should be. If we let the squishes in, they will redirect the movement back to where we were… letting the Democrats do whatever they want, including bending us over.
Imagine what would have happened to either of these men if they had won the presidency.
Ted would have fought hard but it’s doubtful he would have ultimately won the war the Democrats opening and secretly waged against Trump. He may have negotiated with Democrats more than he should have, believing the rhetoric the Dems and the establishment Republicans told him because he believes in bipartisanship.

As to Marco, I feel he was too inexperienced at that time. Today he’s the US Secretary of State and has shown extreme resilience and an almost equal standing in some regards to Trump. He’s able to debate so-called journalists and come right out and tell them they are wrong or ridiculous in their questioning. He’s a man with strong convictions.

I won’t discuss the others in detail but, looking at the list of where they are now, it’s a way of getting a feel for their ability to bounce back. I wasn’t a fan of many of them and feel 80% would have taken us deeper into the Democrats clutches without a way to recover.
Although JD Vance did not run in the 2016 race and wasn’t a fan of Trump until more recent years, he has shown some incredible resilience and agrees with Trump on his policies. If he continues to impress the voters and stand with Trump, there is a great chance he will be the Republican nominee in 2028.

I am in no way a political expert but from my own instinctual thoughts, it seems the nominees should be Vance and Rubio, assuming the next 3+ years goes well. If Vance doesn’t perform well, I assume Rubio will run for president against him.
My reasoning for a Vance/Rubio ticket is that Vance could be president for 8 years with Rubio taking over for another 8 years utilizing all he’s learned as the US Secretary of State. That would be 16 years plus the current 4 and we could truly correct much of the mess the Democrats left for us. Rubio is a very strong choice!
There’s nothing wrong with a Vance/Cruz ticket other than Ted’s been doing such an outstanding job as a Texas Senator. I also don’t know if Ted Cruz would want to run for president in 2028 based on his current responsibilities. I would not be upset if he were VP or President at this point in his career.
Ted Cruz certainly won’t be too old at the age of 58 (born 1970) and Marco will be 57 (born 1971) so their ages are nearly identical. JD Vance will be 44 that year (born 1984), so quite a bit younger. I don’t know that age matters much when it comes to starting a presidential term if you’re between 40-60 years old.
Looking at Trump and Biden, age depends on a person’s health and path to the end of life. Both men were born in the 1940’s with Biden approximately 4 years older than Trump but the difference in their state of mental health is very obvious. The issue is that we often don’t know where a person will end up until they are there.
Let’s look at some possibilities.
A Vance/Rubio presidency…
- 2028: Vance 44 & Rubio 57
- 2032: (Assuming they stay in office)
- 2036: Rubio 65 & unknown VP (8 yrs later – end at 73 years old)
- 2040: (Assuming he stays in office)
- 2044: Rubio 73 & unknown VP (ending at 79)
A Vance/Cruz Presidency is almost identical…
- 2028: Vance 44 & Cruz 58
- 2032: (Assuming they stay in office)
- 2036: Cruz 66 & unknown VP (8 yrs later – end at 74 years old)
- 2040: (Assuming he stays in office)
- 2044: Cruz 74 & unknown V) (ending at 80)
These scenarios show that the three men in question could all run between 2028 and 2044. Even if it was Vance/Cruz in 2028, it could later be Cruz/Rubio in 2036 and then Rubio and someone else in 2044. Rubio would be 73 in 2044 but that could still be a good age to run for president depending on his health.
The problem? We just don’t know what the future brings.